Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 327, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600461

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Falling is a major concern for the health of older adults and significantly affects their quality of life. Identifying the various risk factors and the differences between older patients can be challenging. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for falls among polymedicated community-dwelling older Lebanese patients following a medication review. METHODS: In this analytical cross-sectional study, we examined the risk factors for falls in 850 patients aged ≥ 65 years who were taking ≥ 5 medications daily. The study involved conducting a medication review over the course of a year in primary care settings and using multivariate logistic regression analysis to analyze the data. RESULTS: Our results showed that 106 (19.5%) of the 850 included patients had fallen at least once in the three months prior to the medication review. Loss of appetite and functional dependence were identified as the most significant predictors of falls ORa = 3.020, CI [2.074-4.397] and ORa = 2.877, CI [1.787-4.632], respectively. Other risk factors for falls included drowsiness ORa = 2.172, CI [1.499-3.145], and the use of beta-blockers ORa = 1.943, CI [1.339-2.820]. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of addressing multiple risk factors for falls among Lebanese older adults and emphasizes the need for customized interventions and ongoing monitoring to prevent falls and improve health outcomes. This study sheds light on a critical issue in the Lebanese older population and provides valuable insight into the complex nature of falls among poly-medicated Lebanese community-dwelling older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2021REC-001- INSPECT -09-04.


Subject(s)
Independent Living , Quality of Life , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Primary Health Care
2.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 109: 104947, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746016

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate drug prescribing1 (PIDP) using a combination of explicit and implicit criteria in a sample of Lebanese older adults taking 5 or more chronic medications per day in ambulatory care settings and to identify which factors were associated with PIDP. The explicit criteria included five different lists: Beers, Laroche, European Union (EU(7)-PIM list), STOPP/ START, STOPP Frail, and Alert and Mastering of Iatrogenesis issued by the French High Authority of Health. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to compare the potentially inappropriate medications according to each criterion. METHODS: Data were collected from each patient via a face-to-face interview. Logistic regressions were conducted to evaluate both objectives. RESULTS: Many factors were positively associated with PIDP. The risk of PIDP was positively associated with age (OR =4.692, 95% CI [1.889-11.655]). Treatment for insomnia doubled the odds of PIDP (P<0.05). Participants who picked their medications from the pharmacy and had excess stock of drugs were at higher risk of having PIDP by 2.042 (95% CI [1.199-3.478]) and 2.965(95% CI [1.133-7.762]) respectively. However, patients with a perception of being heavily medicated and patients with a missed dose in the last two weeks had lower odds of PIDP. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a high prevalence of PIDP in Lebanon, which is associated with various correlates. Selecting the appropriate tools to assess PIDP and providing patient education regarding the risks associated with potentially inappropriate medications are issues to be addressed among older adults.


Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Humans , Aged , Drug Prescriptions , Logistic Models , Prevalence
3.
Int J Palliat Nurs ; 28(10): 474-481, 2022 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36269289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The surge in number of people needing palliative care services along with the deficit in nursing knowledge in in this field are challenges to be addressed in order to ensure higher quality end of life life care. AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional, exploratory pilot study was to assess nurses' knowledge in palliative care using the palliative care knowledge test (PCKT). METHOD: Descriptive analysis and correlations were carried out. FINDINGS: Nurses showed insufficient knowledge in palliative care; 52% had a poor level (≤18 points) and 48% a fair level (19-28) of knowledge. No participants scored more than 73% in the total PCKT score. Nurses scored poorest in the management of dyspnoea and psychiatric problems. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated that promoting continuous education in palliative care is needed to provide quality care to terminally ill patients.


Subject(s)
Nurses , Palliative Care , Humans , Lebanon , Cross-Sectional Studies , Clinical Competence , Pilot Projects , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...